<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 6 Misleading Pro-Vaping Arguments We Should Stop Using	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 14:02:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Roy Pecker		</title>
		<link>https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-111025</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Pecker]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Jun 2017 14:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ecigreviewed.wpengine.com/?p=15768#comment-111025</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Quality Top Shelf Medical Marijuana, Hemp Oil, RSO Oil, Dabs, CBD Oil, Wax, Shatter, Edibles, Hash Oil And Many More Available. We ShipDeliver To All The 50 States In The USA And Over 40 Countries Worldwide 100% Discreet And Reliable. For More Info Email Us At...rosemaine53@gmail.com
Thanks!.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quality Top Shelf Medical Marijuana, Hemp Oil, RSO Oil, Dabs, CBD Oil, Wax, Shatter, Edibles, Hash Oil And Many More Available. We ShipDeliver To All The 50 States In The USA And Over 40 Countries Worldwide 100% Discreet And Reliable. For More Info Email Us <a href="mailto:At...rosemaine53@gmail.com">At&#8230;rosemaine53@gmail.com</a><br />
Thanks!.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jonny Stevenson		</title>
		<link>https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-110837</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jonny Stevenson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ecigreviewed.wpengine.com/?p=15768#comment-110837</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Superb post i have found ever. Every vaper should have deep look at this.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Superb post i have found ever. Every vaper should have deep look at this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cigarbabe		</title>
		<link>https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-110618</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cigarbabe]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2017 09:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ecigreviewed.wpengine.com/?p=15768#comment-110618</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109833&quot;&gt;Alex&lt;/a&gt;.

I use a number of devices everyday typically{6-10} each with 4-6 ml tanks. I&#039;m not a sub ohm vaper typically but I do refill my tanks at least 3 times a day and I use 18-24mg even if I sub ohm. I&#039;m pretty sure that adds up to way over Michael Siegal&#039;s &quot;1 ml per day&quot;. Most sub ohm vapers I know blaze through 15+ mls in a few hours/day dripping.
C.B.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109833">Alex</a>.</p>
<p>I use a number of devices everyday typically{6-10} each with 4-6 ml tanks. I&#8217;m not a sub ohm vaper typically but I do refill my tanks at least 3 times a day and I use 18-24mg even if I sub ohm. I&#8217;m pretty sure that adds up to way over Michael Siegal&#8217;s &#8220;1 ml per day&#8221;. Most sub ohm vapers I know blaze through 15+ mls in a few hours/day dripping.<br />
C.B.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: PhillySnaps.com		</title>
		<link>https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-110279</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[PhillySnaps.com]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Aug 2016 20:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ecigreviewed.wpengine.com/?p=15768#comment-110279</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Chipotle illness totals 2016 = 157 - Vaping = 0 ... Enjoy your lunch and leave me alone :)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chipotle illness totals 2016 = 157 &#8211; Vaping = 0 &#8230; Enjoy your lunch and leave me alone 🙂</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: StormFinch		</title>
		<link>https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-110059</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StormFinch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 19:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ecigreviewed.wpengine.com/?p=15768#comment-110059</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A little late here, but since this piece is making the rounds again...

It seems RJR is now taking a page from our playbook and giving the &quot;commonly found in foods&quot; spiel. We are once again getting a list of ingredients however, and frankly I&#039;m sitting here cringing at what I used to inhale. Anyone have a clue what setting any essential oil, of which there are quite a few, on fire and breathing it does? And of course there&#039;s the other garbage as well. http://www.rjrt.com/commercial-integrity/ingredients/cigarette-ingredients/ 

As to the diacetyl argument, it&#039;s a summation of a quote by Jennifer S. Pierce et al. in &#039;Diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione exposures associated with cigarette smoking: implications for risk assessment of food and flavoring workers&#039; and it goes like this: &quot;Further, because smoking has not been shown to be a risk factor for bronchiolitis obliterans, our findings are inconsistent with claims that diacetyl and/or 2,3-pentanedione exposure are risk factors for this disease.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little late here, but since this piece is making the rounds again&#8230;</p>
<p>It seems RJR is now taking a page from our playbook and giving the &#8220;commonly found in foods&#8221; spiel. We are once again getting a list of ingredients however, and frankly I&#8217;m sitting here cringing at what I used to inhale. Anyone have a clue what setting any essential oil, of which there are quite a few, on fire and breathing it does? And of course there&#8217;s the other garbage as well. <a href="http://www.rjrt.com/commercial-integrity/ingredients/cigarette-ingredients/" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.rjrt.com/commercial-integrity/ingredients/cigarette-ingredients/</a> </p>
<p>As to the diacetyl argument, it&#8217;s a summation of a quote by Jennifer S. Pierce et al. in &#8216;Diacetyl and 2,3-pentanedione exposures associated with cigarette smoking: implications for risk assessment of food and flavoring workers&#8217; and it goes like this: &#8220;Further, because smoking has not been shown to be a risk factor for bronchiolitis obliterans, our findings are inconsistent with claims that diacetyl and/or 2,3-pentanedione exposure are risk factors for this disease.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vladimir Poutine		</title>
		<link>https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-110051</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vladimir Poutine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 16:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ecigreviewed.wpengine.com/?p=15768#comment-110051</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-110050&quot;&gt;Jenny&lt;/a&gt;.

Thats good , but I don&#039;t like a &#039;tobacco company&#039; involvement !]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-110050">Jenny</a>.</p>
<p>Thats good , but I don&#8217;t like a &#8216;tobacco company&#8217; involvement !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jenny		</title>
		<link>https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-110050</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jenny]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 May 2016 08:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ecigreviewed.wpengine.com/?p=15768#comment-110050</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-110044&quot;&gt;Vladimir Poutine&lt;/a&gt;.

They are already free on the NHS since early January this year. A device made by British American Tobacco I think.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-110044">Vladimir Poutine</a>.</p>
<p>They are already free on the NHS since early January this year. A device made by British American Tobacco I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vladimir Poutine		</title>
		<link>https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-110045</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vladimir Poutine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 18:09:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ecigreviewed.wpengine.com/?p=15768#comment-110045</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109833&quot;&gt;Alex&lt;/a&gt;.

Correct !  I&#039;m running a 0.5 ohm coil.  This ends up being about 35 watts. There is a competing to see who can make the most &#039;smoke&#039;(vapour) , which is stupid. I was driving behind a Buick the other day and every 30 seconds or so a BIG PUFF of vapour would come out the window.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109833">Alex</a>.</p>
<p>Correct !  I&#8217;m running a 0.5 ohm coil.  This ends up being about 35 watts. There is a competing to see who can make the most &#8216;smoke'(vapour) , which is stupid. I was driving behind a Buick the other day and every 30 seconds or so a BIG PUFF of vapour would come out the window.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Vladimir Poutine		</title>
		<link>https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-110044</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vladimir Poutine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 May 2016 18:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ecigreviewed.wpengine.com/?p=15768#comment-110044</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Royal College of Physicians say:  It&#039;s safe, go ahead and use them instead of Smoking. NHS might even make them Available for FREE to patients that want to quit smoking.

This is the latest news, from Canada.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Royal College of Physicians say:  It&#8217;s safe, go ahead and use them instead of Smoking. NHS might even make them Available for FREE to patients that want to quit smoking.</p>
<p>This is the latest news, from Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sho2daPan		</title>
		<link>https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-110034</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sho2daPan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 01:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ecigreviewed.wpengine.com/?p=15768#comment-110034</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109827&quot;&gt;Jo-Erlend Schinstad&lt;/a&gt;.

I never have Exaggerated in my points, but this article tears every point we lay people use to engage thoses with letters after their names to take us seriously.  As to my Zeal I am heartbroken that this was writen from a vapers perspective and am Surprised theblikevof Famous ANTZ have not jumped on this:Yet.
Will I still jumpnin on certain threads sure but am carefulnnit to usecany of thevabove as it is not worthy of factual debate.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109827">Jo-Erlend Schinstad</a>.</p>
<p>I never have Exaggerated in my points, but this article tears every point we lay people use to engage thoses with letters after their names to take us seriously.  As to my Zeal I am heartbroken that this was writen from a vapers perspective and am Surprised theblikevof Famous ANTZ have not jumped on this:Yet.<br />
Will I still jumpnin on certain threads sure but am carefulnnit to usecany of thevabove as it is not worthy of factual debate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JP		</title>
		<link>https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109883</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 02:57:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ecigreviewed.wpengine.com/?p=15768#comment-109883</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Frankly, when I see anti vaper statements like &quot;e-cigarettes are touted as safe alternatives to regular cigarettes&quot;,   I wonder whether what we say really matters, because it&#039;s all just being made up anyway.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Frankly, when I see anti vaper statements like &#8220;e-cigarettes are touted as safe alternatives to regular cigarettes&#8221;,   I wonder whether what we say really matters, because it&#8217;s all just being made up anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JP		</title>
		<link>https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109882</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 02:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ecigreviewed.wpengine.com/?p=15768#comment-109882</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109811&quot;&gt;Greg Dj-g&lt;/a&gt;.

Maybe use &quot;components&quot; rather than &quot;ingredients&quot;.   Technically each flavouring should be a separate ingredient.   For example, a long island ice tea might have 3 components (alcohol, cola and juice) but 8 ingredients (where each type of alcohol is listed separately).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109811">Greg Dj-g</a>.</p>
<p>Maybe use &#8220;components&#8221; rather than &#8220;ingredients&#8221;.   Technically each flavouring should be a separate ingredient.   For example, a long island ice tea might have 3 components (alcohol, cola and juice) but 8 ingredients (where each type of alcohol is listed separately).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: JP		</title>
		<link>https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109881</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JP]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Apr 2016 02:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ecigreviewed.wpengine.com/?p=15768#comment-109881</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109835&quot;&gt;Stevan&lt;/a&gt;.

It&#039;s fair to say they contain glycol, glycerol, flavourings and optionally nicotine. It&#039;s important to force detractors to specify the component rather than the system, when they say &quot;e-cigarettes cause XYZ&quot;.   As for what appears when you heat the liquid, well no consumable on the market has to state that on the packaging. Too many variables.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109835">Stevan</a>.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s fair to say they contain glycol, glycerol, flavourings and optionally nicotine. It&#8217;s important to force detractors to specify the component rather than the system, when they say &#8220;e-cigarettes cause XYZ&#8221;.   As for what appears when you heat the liquid, well no consumable on the market has to state that on the packaging. Too many variables.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ben		</title>
		<link>https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109867</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ben]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Apr 2016 06:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ecigreviewed.wpengine.com/?p=15768#comment-109867</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109833&quot;&gt;Alex&lt;/a&gt;.

Doing some sub ohm squonking for about the past two weeks. So far, it seems I use ~ 3ml daily. Using evods &#038; MTL I use ~ 1.5ml daily. Can feasibly see a heavy sub ohm user using two to three times more than my moderate use. So, yes agree that sub ohming could use ~10ml+ daily.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109833">Alex</a>.</p>
<p>Doing some sub ohm squonking for about the past two weeks. So far, it seems I use ~ 3ml daily. Using evods &amp; MTL I use ~ 1.5ml daily. Can feasibly see a heavy sub ohm user using two to three times more than my moderate use. So, yes agree that sub ohming could use ~10ml+ daily.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: red		</title>
		<link>https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109865</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[red]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 09:18:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ecigreviewed.wpengine.com/?p=15768#comment-109865</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Just wanted to comment about the part saying &quot;And you hardly see asthmatics blowing out clouds, so we’re clearly consuming larger quantities of PG with each puff too&quot;. My girlfriend is actually an asthmatic that used to rely on inhalators on a daily basis. She was never a smoker. She claimed that being indoors where I vaped helped her breath better and hasn&#039;t used an inhaler for over a year now apart from few times when she had the flu. She also vapes about 10ml of liquid / month herself just for recreative purposes and says her asthma isn&#039;t worse for it.

So purely empiric evidence, but seems like passive vaping/vaping actually has some sort of benefits for asthmatics, at least, in our case. Could be a complete coincidence too, but we&#039;ve found it pretty interesting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just wanted to comment about the part saying &#8220;And you hardly see asthmatics blowing out clouds, so we’re clearly consuming larger quantities of PG with each puff too&#8221;. My girlfriend is actually an asthmatic that used to rely on inhalators on a daily basis. She was never a smoker. She claimed that being indoors where I vaped helped her breath better and hasn&#8217;t used an inhaler for over a year now apart from few times when she had the flu. She also vapes about 10ml of liquid / month herself just for recreative purposes and says her asthma isn&#8217;t worse for it.</p>
<p>So purely empiric evidence, but seems like passive vaping/vaping actually has some sort of benefits for asthmatics, at least, in our case. Could be a complete coincidence too, but we&#8217;ve found it pretty interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rok Klobucar		</title>
		<link>https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109864</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rok Klobucar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 04:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ecigreviewed.wpengine.com/?p=15768#comment-109864</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109789&quot;&gt;Attila Danko&lt;/a&gt;.

I am a vaper for 4 months and I am still afraid that vaping will kill me sonner than smoking... I assume that this fear comes from all the fear-mongering through media and ANTZ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109789">Attila Danko</a>.</p>
<p>I am a vaper for 4 months and I am still afraid that vaping will kill me sonner than smoking&#8230; I assume that this fear comes from all the fear-mongering through media and ANTZ&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rok Klobucar		</title>
		<link>https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109863</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rok Klobucar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 04:43:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ecigreviewed.wpengine.com/?p=15768#comment-109863</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109803&quot;&gt;Fergus Mason&lt;/a&gt;.

Vaping MIGHT kill me to... We don&#039;t know...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109803">Fergus Mason</a>.</p>
<p>Vaping MIGHT kill me to&#8230; We don&#8217;t know&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rok Klobucar		</title>
		<link>https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109862</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rok Klobucar]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 04:42:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ecigreviewed.wpengine.com/?p=15768#comment-109862</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109855&quot;&gt;Martin smith&lt;/a&gt;.

Why not?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109855">Martin smith</a>.</p>
<p>Why not?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CarolAST		</title>
		<link>https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109861</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CarolAST]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 03:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ecigreviewed.wpengine.com/?p=15768#comment-109861</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109858&quot;&gt;Lee Johnson&lt;/a&gt;.

Well, Farsalinos is just parroting the Establishment line.He is after all just another one of the same old chemistry crowd that doesn&#039;t know jack about infections and sees no need to do so.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109858">Lee Johnson</a>.</p>
<p>Well, Farsalinos is just parroting the Establishment line.He is after all just another one of the same old chemistry crowd that doesn&#8217;t know jack about infections and sees no need to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Lee Johnson		</title>
		<link>https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109859</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee Johnson]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2016 01:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://ecigreviewed.wpengine.com/?p=15768#comment-109859</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109846&quot;&gt;DougPlanet&lt;/a&gt;.

This is excellent, and exactly my intention for the post! :-) 

The third one is my favourite: it makes the point clearly, powerfully and transparently. I don&#039;t see how it would hurt the message to say that instead, at all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://ecigarettereviewed.com/6-misleading-pro-vaping-arguments/#comment-109846">DougPlanet</a>.</p>
<p>This is excellent, and exactly my intention for the post! 🙂 </p>
<p>The third one is my favourite: it makes the point clearly, powerfully and transparently. I don&#8217;t see how it would hurt the message to say that instead, at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
